Electoral Interference: Democrats in McCurtain see 3.1 change in votes after private funding given to voting officialsr

Electoral Interference: Democrats in McCurtain see 3.1 change in votes after private funding given to voting officialsr
Adobe Stock
0Comments

In McCurtain, where voting officials received funding from a Mark Zuckerberg-related organization, Democrat support rose 3.1% from 2016 to 2020.

In 2020, Joe Biden secured 16% of 11,407 votes, compared to the 16% earned by Hillary Clinton in 2016.

Support for Trump increased in McCurtain 6.9% in 2020.

McCurtain was one of 43 Oklahoma areas where voting officials received money from the progressive Centre for Tech and Civic Life (CTCL). A $350 million donation from Facebook founder Zuckerberg and his wife provided funding for the grants.

Grants from the organization, ranging from $5,000 to $19 million, were given to voting officials in exchange for specific conditions being followed. This included strategically targeting voters, creating ballots and developing what are known as “cure letters” to correct ballots at risk of being thrown out for discrepancies in signatures.

Democrat support across Oklahoma areas that received funding from the CTCL rose 22.8% in 2020 from 2016.

Such support rose 6.1% in Oklahoma areas that didn’t receive any funding from the CTCL.

The Republican Party earned 6.9% more votes in Oklahoma districts assisted by the CTCL, compared to 5.1% in counties without similar funding.

The influx of private money on such a large scale was criticized throughout the contentious 2020 election.

The CTCL was sued by Louisiana’s Attorney General in October 2021 “to prevent the injection of unregulated private money…and protect the integrity of elections in the State.” The lawsuit wasn’t allowed to proceed by a State judge.

Criticism of the CTCL also stemmed from favoring “predominantly Democratic counties” and even gave them a headstart to apply for funding, according to emails obtained through Right-to-Know requests.

“Mark Zuckerberg is providing nearly as much money to this year’s election administration as the federal government,” Phil Kline with the Amistad Project said in a late October 2020 press release.

The US government, in the run-up to the 2020 election, was criticized for underfunding the electoral process at a critical time.

Voting differences in some Oklahoma locations in 2020 election
Area Received CTCL Funding? % Change in Republican Support % Change in Democratic Support
Adair Yes 16.7 0.4
Atoka Yes 11.6 -3.8
Beaver Yes -1.3 8
Beckham Yes 7.3 9.2
Blaine Yes 8.7 -3.2
Caddo Yes 8.2 10.3
Canadian Yes 8.9 43.4
Cherokee Yes 12.3 10.5
Cimarron Yes 0.7 -1.4
Cleveland Yes 6.6 28.3
Coal Yes 10.2 -91.7
Comanche Yes 9 19.9
Cotton Yes 3.1 -7.3
Craig Yes 9.4 -93
Delaware Yes 14.6 4.9
Garfield Yes 6 11.9
Grant Yes 4.9 -2.8
Greer Yes 8.3 1.5
Harmon Yes 4.5 -21.3
Harper Yes 0.7 189.4
Haskell Yes 12.5 -11.2
Hughes Yes 14.4 -4.4
Jackson Yes 7.1 11.7
Jefferson Yes 6.1 -12.6
Kingfisher Yes 7.1 8.7
Kiowa Yes 3 -8.9
Le Flore Yes 13.9 1.5
Lincoln Yes 10.7 7.4
Logan Yes 14.5 28.4
Marshall Yes 16.3 478.9
McClain Yes 16.1 23.8
McCurtain Yes 9.6 3.1
Murray Yes 10.5 6.3
Noble Yes 2.9 11.3
Okfuskee Yes 9.2 -5
Oklahoma Yes 2.5 25.6
Pottawatomie Yes 13.4 20.9
Pushmataha Yes 12.1 -10.7
Roger Mills Yes 5.3 11.3
Rogers Yes 10.1 21.3
Sequoyah Yes 11.3 -0.8
Tulsa Yes 4.4 24.1
Woodward Yes 4.2 15.1
Alfalfa County No 2.3 7.4
Bryan County No 17.8 18.5
Carter County No 6.9 11.7
Choctaw County No 11.7 1.4
Creek County No 8 12.6
Custer County No 3 12.6
Dewey County No 8.1 -3.6
Ellis County No 4.8 4.5
Garvin County No 7.6 0.5
Grady County No 7.1 6.7
Johnston County No 11.3 -6.1
Kay County No 5.4 8.1
Latimer County No 10.9 -4.4
Love County No 13.1 -3.3
Major County No -76.6 -88.9
Mayes County No 131.6 68.7
McIntosh County No -46.6 -40.7
Muskogee County No 9.9 0.6
Nowata County No 8.7 -4
Okmulgee County No 8.1 -0.6
Osage County No 12.3 7.2
Ottawa County No 12 3.9
Pawnee County No 11.4 1.4
Payne County No 7 24.1
Pittsburg County No 8.6 1.5
Pontotoc County No 3.6 13.2
Seminole County No 7.1 3.8
Stephens County No 9.7 2.2
Texas County No -2.5 4.2
Tillman County No 6.8 -9.1
Wagoner County No 13.7 25.9
Washington County No 7.9 14.7
Washita County No 6 1.7
Woods County No 1.6 13.2


Related

Dr. Mehmet Oz CMS Administrator

Homestead of Hugo tops Choctaw County nursing homes in Q1 2026

In the first quarter of 2026, Homestead of Hugo led Choctaw County as the largest nursing home, providing daily care for an average of 58.8 residents.

1200 W Finley, Hugo, OK 74743

Elmbrook of Hugo receives 2-star CMS rating in first quarter of 2026

In the first quarter of 2026, Elmbrook of Hugo was one of two for-profit nursing homes in Choctaw County, Oklahoma, and earned a two-star overall rating from CMS.

Dr. Oz serves as the 17th Administrator for the Centers for Medicare u0026 Medicaid Services

Broken Bow Health and Rehabilitation had four owners in Q1 2026

Since May 1, 2022, four stakeholders have owned Broken Bow Health and Rehabilitation, which held a CMS overall rating of two for the first quarter of 2026.